Essential Insights for Lawyers Regarding Spinal Cord Stimulators

Spinal cord stimulators (SCS), often considered a last-resort treatment for chronic pain, especially in post-surgical cases, have become a focal point in legal circles due to their complex implications for personal injury claims. These advanced devices are surgically implanted to send electrical signals to spinal cord areas to reduce the perception of pain, aiming to provide relief where other treatments fail.

The high costs and potential complications associated with SCS therapy necessitate an in-depth understanding within the legal profession, particularly for attorneys navigating client claims and seeking appropriate lifetime care planning. The average expenditure for spinal cord stimulator implantation can range significantly, factoring in the initial surgery, device, and any necessary follow-up procedures or revisions.

Failure of back surgery syndrome (FBSS) patients often resort to spinal cord stimulator implantation when other pain management options have been exhausted. However, it’s essential for legal representatives to recognize that SCS isn’t suitable for all chronic pain patients, as efficacy varies and complications can include infection, bleeding, lead migration, and device malfunction.

A thorough examination of each spinal injury case must account for potential settlement outcomes, including the implications of implanting or damaging a spinal cord stimulator. Attorneys handling such cases face the dual challenge of grasping the medical complexities and evaluating the current and future impact on their clients’ quality of life, which can feature prominently in settlement negotiations or litigation.

Although SCS can offer significant relief for those suffering from debilitating chronic pain, there is an ongoing debate regarding its long-term benefits and risks. The device is not universally recommended, and its adoption as a pain management strategy raises critical questions about patient selection, informed consent, and the cost-effectiveness of this therapeutic intervention.

From a legal standpoint, SCS devices introduce a host of new variables in the adjudication of spinal injury claims. Attorneys must therefore work closely with medical professionals and vocational experts to establish a comprehensive life care plan that addresses the client’s needs, potential future medical interventions, and financial compensation corresponding to the impact of the spinal injury.

For legal professionals, acquiring expertise in the nuances of SCS therapy, including its intended role in pain management and the broader legal implications, is crucial. The advent of SCS therapies represents both an opportunity for pain relief for patients and a challenge for legal professionals navigating the intricacies of spinal injury litigation.

In conclusion, as spinal cord stimulators continue to gain traction as a treatment for chronic pain conditions, especially in cases of failed back surgery, legal professionals must diligently educate themselves on every aspect of this technology’s use, impact, and the resulting legal implications for their clients. An attorney’s ability to advocate effectively in these cases depends on a deep understanding of both the potential benefits and drawbacks of SCS therapy.

LETS GET IN CONTACT

For immediate assistance, please call 855.586.2615
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • Hidden
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.